Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd

Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd
Date of order
04 Sep 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S.asian Paints (I) Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2541 of 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1046 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Asian Paints (I) Ltd. ...Respondent Mr.B.M. Chaterji and Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for the appellant. Mr. S.S. Shetty for the respondent. CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C.: . The delay is of 571 days. An affidavit has been filed in support of the Motion. The ITAT order received in the office of the Central III, Mumbai on 9th October, 2003. The Scrutiny was done on 29th December, 2003. There is no explanation for the delay between this period. File was sent to the Ministry of law after 16th January, 2004 and the Appeal was filed on 29th August, 2005 that is after one and half years after the file was sent by the Ministry of law. In our opinion the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion dismissed. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan