Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. M/S.city Corp.securities

Mumbai v. M/S.city Corp.securities

High Court 27 Feb 2009 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

27 Feb 2009

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S.city Corp.securities, the High Court (2009) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

K.J. IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1010 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-tax-9 ) Mumbai )..Applicant Versus M/s.City Corp.Securities & ) Investments Ltd., )..Respondents ---- Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the applicant. Mr.B.D.Damodar i/by Kanga & Co. for respondents. ---- Coram : F.I.Rebello & R.S.Mohite,JJ Date : 27.2.2009. PC 1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties. We have perused the questions of law. We find that these are purely factual. There are findings of fact recorded. Consequently, questions of law as framed would not arise. Appeal accordingly dismissed. (R.S.Mohite,J) (F.I.Rebello,J)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.