Mumbai v. M/S.cozy Mercantile Ltd
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S.cozy Mercantile Ltd
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S.cozy Mercantile Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2648 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1087 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai .........................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Cozy Mercantile Ltd.......Respondent
Mrs. P.P. Bhosale with Mr. B.M. Chatterjee
i/b.Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant
Mr. A.K. Jasani for Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 36 days. Considering the
cause shown the same would amount to sufficient
cause. Hence, delay condoned. Motion made absolute
in terms of prayer clauwe (a). Office to register
the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue