Mumbai v. M/S.klassik Garments Pvt. Ltd
High Court
23 Oct 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S.klassik Garments Pvt. Ltd
Date of order
23 Oct 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S.klassik Garments Pvt. Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1576 of 2006
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.823 OF 2006
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Klassik Garments Pvt. Ltd.....Respondents
Mr. P.S. Sahadevan for the Appellant.
Mr.S.J. Mehta for the Respondent
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 23rd October, 2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 23rd October, 2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. The order dated 15th September, 2004 was
received in the office of the CIT-3 on 1st November,
2004. After that procedure Chief C.I.T. granted
approval on 25th February, 2005. Last date for
filing the Appeal was 1st March, 2005. The File was
sent to the Ministry of law on 25th February, 2005
and the draft was received on 23rd February, 2006.
There is no explanation given for the delay of one
year. Considering that the cause shown does not
amount to sufficient cause. Hence Motion dismissed.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.