Mumbai v. M/S.munshaw Investment Corporation
High Court
17 Jul 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. M/S.munshaw Investment Corporation
Date of order
17 Jul 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. M/S.munshaw Investment Corporation, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
MGN
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2584 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1067 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai .....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Munshaw Investment Corporation...Respondent
Mr.R.Ashokan i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Learned Counsel shows office copy of the
Department showing that the Respondents have been
served. Affidavit of service to be filed in the
Registry within two weeks from today. There is a
delay of 86 days. Considering the affidavit in
support of the Motion in our opinion the same
amounts to sufficient cause. In the light of that
Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a).
Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue