In Mumbai v. M/S.new Excelsior Theatre, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2731 of 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1120 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
M/s.New Excelsior Theatre
Pvt. Ltd......................Respondent
Mr. P.S.Sahadevan,for the Appellant.
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
P.C.
. The delay of 463 days in preferring the
Appeal. Shri J.M. Kadrekar has filed an affidavit
in support of the Motion. There is no explanation
whatsoever for the delay. Apart from that the tax
effect is only Rs.2.00 lakhs. Hence Motion
dismissed as sufficient cause not shown.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue