Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. M/S.puri Construction(Bom

Mumbai v. M/S.puri Construction(Bom

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Sep 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. M/S.puri Construction(Bom, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

(-1-) MGN IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2977 of 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1230 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. M/s.Puri Construction(Bom.) ...Respondent Mr. A.S.Rao, for the Appellant. Ms. Usha Dalal, for the Respondent CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . As the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs learned Counsel seeks leave to withdraw the Appeal along with Motion. Appeal along with Motion dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified copy expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.