In Mumbai v. M/S.voltas Ltd, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2588 OF 2004
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1068 OF 2004
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai .....................Appellant
Vs.
M/s.Voltas Ltd...............Respondent
Mr.A.D. Kangoo i/b. Pankaj Kapoor for the
Appellant.
Mr. N.L. Thakkar i/b. Mulla & Mulla for Respondents
CORAM: F.I.
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 17TH JULY,2007
P.C.:
P.C.:
. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
Considering the cause shown the same would amount to
sufficient cause. In the light of that Motion made
absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to
register the Appeal.
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)
(J.P.DEVADHAR, J.)(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
(F.I.REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue