Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. Mumbai

Mumbai v. Mumbai

High Court 04 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Mumbai v. Mumbai

Date of order

04 Aug 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Mumbai, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.

Decision: Therefore,following this judgment, this appeal is dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONINCOME TAX APPEAL No. 208 OF 2007 The Commissioner of Income Tax-3AppellantMumbaiVs. M/s Hercules Investment P. Ltd.RespondentMumbai Mr. J. D. Mistry with P.C. Tripathi, for theappellant. Mr. Vimal Gupta, for the Respondent. PC :- .It is submitted at the bar that the questionsraised in this appeal are answered against the Revenueby the judgment of this Court in Income Tax Appeal No.607 of 2005, dated 17th October, 2007. Therefore,following this judgment, this appeal is dismissed.

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.