Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. Parle Pet Private Ltd

Mumbai v. Parle Pet Private Ltd

High Court 17 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

17 Dec 2008

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Parle Pet Private Ltd, the High Court (2008) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: 4128 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration, which is accordingly dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY VPH ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.2163 OF 2008 The Commissioner of Income-Tax-8 Appellant Mumbai Vs Parle Pet Private Ltd. ... Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the appellant. Mr. V. B. Patel, for the respondent. CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, & V. C. DAGA, JJ. DATED: DECEMBER 17, 2008. P.C.: ---- . In view of dismissal of Notice of Motion No. 4128 of 2008, present Appeal does not survive for consideration, which is accordingly dismissed. Sd/- Sd/- [ V. C. DAGA, J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.