Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Radheshyam R Chowhan

Mumbai v. Radheshyam R Chowhan

High Court 08 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Radheshyam R Chowhan
Date of order
08 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Radheshyam R Chowhan, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
VISHALSUBHASHPAREKAR Digitally signed byVISHAL SUBHASHPAREKARDate: 2022.03.0910:30:13 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAYORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO.811 OF 2020 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax 26, Mumbai ...Appellant vs. Radheshyam R Chowhan ...Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NOS.67 OF 2021; 120 OF 2020; 467 OF2021; 515 OF 2021; 572 OF 2021; 577 OF 2021; 614 OF 2021; 673 OF 2021; 280 OF 2020; 372 OF 2020; 379 OF 2020; 5168 OF 2021; 5401 OF 2021; 5474 OF 2021; 5474 OF 2021; 1030 OF 2022; 5560OF 2021; 5734 OF 2021; 5741 OF 2021; 702 OF 2020; 5743 OF2021; 747 OF 2020; 750 OF 2020; 755 OF 2020; 6728 OF 2021;6743 OF 2021; 6839 OF 2021; 6845 OF 2021; 8462 OF 2021; 8525OF 2021; 10608 OF 2021; 10625 OF 2021; 10904 OF 2021; 11171OF 2021; 11173 OF 2021; 11168 OF 2021; 11352 OF 2021; 11353 OF2021; 11720 OF 2021; 11721 OF 2021; 11988 OF 2021; 11989 OF2021; 11994 OF 2021; 12097 OF 2021; 12219 OF 2021; 14067 OF2021; 14413 OF 2021; 14416 OF 2021; 14422 OF 2021; 15306 OF2021; 15309 OF 2021; 15328 OF 2021; 15478 OF 2021; 15487 OF2021; 15497 OF 2021 ; 1699 OF 2019; 22132 OF 2021; 22141 OF2021; 22143 OF 2021; 25782 OF 2021; 25800 OF 2021; 25857 OF2021; 25911 OF 2021; 26175 OF 2021; 31006 OF 2021; 31008 OF 2021; 31013 OF 2021; 31021 OF 2021; 31027 OF 2021 ; 31031 OF2021; 31151 OF 2021; 31455 OF 2021; 31488 OF 2021; 31527 OF2021; 31707 OF 2021; 31757 OF 2021; 31784 OF 2021; 31847 OF2021; 31849 OF 2021 AND 31869 OF 2021 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.468 OF 2022; 1022 OF 2022; 996 OF2022; 1004 OF 2022; 989 OF 2022; 1005 OF 2022; 993 OF 2022WITHI.P.A. (L) NOS.20301 OF 2021 AND 20230 OF 2021 Mr. Sham Walve, for the Appellant Mr. Ajay Singh, for Respondent in ITXAL No. 10904 of 2021 andITXAL No. 11721 of 2021. Ms. Namrata Kasale, for the Respondent in ITXAL No. 11173 of2021 and ITXAL No. 11188 of 2021. Ms. Aasifa Khan, for the Respondent in ITXAL No. 26175 of 2021. CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ. DATE : MARCH 08, 2022 P.C.: .Mr. Walve states that the issue in these Appeals is squarelycovered by an order dated 11[th] February, 2019 passed by this Courtin Income Tax Appeal Nos. 1004 of 2016 and order dated 15[th] July,2019 in Income Tax Appeal No. 413 of 2017 and therefore theseAppeals can be disposed. 2.Accordingly all the Appeals are disposed. 3.In view of above, In Person Application (L) Nos. 20301 of2021 and 20230 of 2021 also stand disposed. 4.Registry to inform those Respondents. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K. R. SHRIRAM, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan