Case Law › High Court › Mumbai v. R.r. Kamani

Mumbai v. R.r. Kamani

High Court 04 Sep 2007 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

04 Sep 2007

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. R.r. Kamani, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: As the Motion is dismissed Appeal stands dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.1040 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. R.R. Kamani .....Respondent Mr. P.S.Sahadevan,for the Appellant. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C. . As the Motion is dismissed Appeal stands dismissed. Refund of Court Fees as per Rules. Certified Copy expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.