Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Sansui Petrochem Ltd

Mumbai v. Sansui Petrochem Ltd

High Court 04 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Sansui Petrochem Ltd
Date of order
04 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Sansui Petrochem Ltd, the High Court (2007) dismissed the appeal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2275 of 2005 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.985 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Sansui Petrochem Ltd................Respondent Mr.P.S.Sahadevan for the Appellant Mr. Subhash Shetty, for the Respondent CORAM: F.I. J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. P.C.: . The tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs. There is a delay of 319 days. 2. Considering that the tax incidence is less than Rs.4.00 lakhs Motion along with Appeal dismissed. Refund of Court Fees as per rules. Certified copy expedited. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan