Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna

Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna

High Court 04 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna
Date of order
04 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.512 of 2005 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.278 OF 2005 The Commissioner of Income-tax Mumbai ..Appellant Vs. Shri Ajay P. Bafna...................Respondent Mr. B.M. Chatterjee with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale for the appellant. Ms. Aasifa Khan, for the Respondent. CORAM: F.I. CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ. DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007 P.C.: P.C.: . There is a delay of 251 days in filing the Appeal. There is an affidavit in support of the Motion. It appears that after the order was received by the Commissioner of Income Tax on 18th May, 2004 the matter was forwarded to the Law Ministry for drafting the Appeal on 2nd June, 2004. The draft appeal was collected on 7th June, 2006. Between that period and 17th January, 2005 funds were not available for purchasing stamp papers. In these circumstances it is pointed out that the cause shown amounts to sufficient cause and hence delay ought to be condoned. 2. Reply has been filed on behalf of the respondents opposing the condonation of delay (-2-) contending that the cause shown would not amount to sufficient cause. 3. Considering the fact that the delay was occasioned in the Law Department and non-availability of money to buy stamp papers in our opinion the cause shown amounts to sufficient cause. Hence delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal. (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan