Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna
High Court
04 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna
Date of order
04 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Shri Ajay P. Bafna, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.514 of 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.280 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
Shri Ajay P. Bafna...................Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale, for the
Appellant.
Ms. Aasifa Khan for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 415 days in filing the
Appeal. The cause shown was that the matter was
pending with the Law Ministry for drafting the
Appeal and on account of non-availability of funds
for buying stamp papers. There is an affidavit
opposing the motion.
2. Considering the cause shown, in our opinion
the same would amount to sufficient cause. Hence
delay condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of
prayer clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue