Mumbai v. Shri Akbar Amirali Jaffer
High Court
14 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Shri Akbar Amirali Jaffer
Date of order
14 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Shri Akbar Amirali Jaffer, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Decision: Motion along with Appeal stand dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1596 OF 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG) NO. 642 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income Tax .... Appellant
Mumbai
Vs.
Shri Akbar Amirali Jaffer .... Respondent
Mr. Ashok Kotangale for Appellant.
CORAM : F.I. REBELLO, &
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
. J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ
DATE : 14TH AUGUST, 2007
P.C.
. As the tax incidence is less than Rs. 4
lakhs, the learned counsel seeks leave to withdraw
the motion and the appeal. The questions of law,
if any, is kept open for consideration in an
appropriate proceeding. Motion along with Appeal
stand dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees
as per rules. Certified copy expedited.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue