Mumbai v. Shri Ashok C. Samani
High Court
04 Aug 2007 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Shri Ashok C. Samani
Date of order
04 Aug 2007
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Shri Ashok C. Samani, the High Court (2007) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
(-1-)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO.560 of 2005
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL LODGING NO.295 OF 2005
The Commissioner of Income-tax
Mumbai ..Appellant
Vs.
Shri Ashok C. Samani.............Respondent
Mr. B.M. Chatterji with Mrs. P.P. Bhosale, for the
Appellant.
Ms. A.K.Jasani, for the Respondent.
CORAM: F.I.
CORAM: F.I.REBELLO&J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.DATED: 4TH SEPTEMEBR, 2007
J.P.DEVADHAR,JJ.
P.C.:
P.C.:
. There is a delay of 208 days in filing the
Appeal. There is an affidavit in support of the
Motion. No affidavit in reply has been filed
denying the contents of the said affidavit.
2. Even otherwise considering the cause shown
the same amounts to sufficient cause. Hence delay
condoned. Motion made absolute in terms of prayer
clause (a). Office to register the Appeal.
(J.P. DEVADHAR, J.) (F.I. REBELLO, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.