Mumbai v. Standard Chartered Bank
High Court
17 Dec 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai v. Standard Chartered Bank
Date of order
17 Dec 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Mumbai v. Standard Chartered Bank, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
VPH
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION No.2279 OF 2008
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) No.2746 OF 2007
The Director of Income-Tax Appellant
Mumbai
Vs
Standard Chartered Bank ... Respondent
Mr. Parag Vyas i/b P. S. Sahadevan, for the appellant.
Mr. Dinesh Vyas with P.C. Tripathi, for the
respondent.
CORAM: Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, &
V. C. DAGA, JJ.
DATED: DECEMBER 17, 2008.
P.C.:
----
. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant
and the learned counsel for the respondent. By the
present Notice of Motion, applicant is seeking
condonation of delay of 147 days in filing the above
appeal. Perused Notice of Motion and the affidavit in
support thereof. Sufficient cause is made out for
condoning the delay. There is no case of inaction,
negligence or want of bona fide on the part of the
appellant. Hence, Notice of Motion is made absolute
in terms of prayer Clause (a).
Sd/- Sd/-
- 2 -
[ V. C. DAGA,J.] [ Dr. S. RADHAKRISHNAN, J.]
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue