In Mumbai Xvi v. M/S Paras Authorised Service Centre, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2003
IN
INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 291 OF 2003
The Commissioner of Income Tax,
Mumbai XVI .. Appellant
V/s
M/s Paras Authorised Service Centre .. Respondent
Mr.A.N. Kotangale with Mr.P.P. Kakade for the Appellant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 22ND AUGUST 2006
P.C.
P.C. :
P.C.
1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this motion.
None present for the Respondent though served.
2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 173 days in
filing the appeal. An affidavit in support has been
filed giving explanation that the records were being
transferred from one section to another and that caused
the delay in filing the appeal. Though we are not much
- 2 -
impressed, we accept the explanation to avoid prejudice.
Motion granted in terms of prayer (a). Delay is
condoned. Appeal be listed for admission on 4th
September 2006.
(H.L. GOKHALE, J.)
(J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.