Case LawHigh Court › Mumbai Xvi v. M/S Paras Authorised Servi...

Mumbai Xvi v. M/S Paras Authorised Service Centre

High Court 22 Aug 2006 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Mumbai Xvi v. M/S Paras Authorised Service Centre
Date of order
22 Aug 2006
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Mumbai Xvi v. M/S Paras Authorised Service Centre, the High Court (2006) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1064 OF 2003 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 291 OF 2003 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai XVI .. Appellant V/s M/s Paras Authorised Service Centre .. Respondent Mr.A.N. Kotangale with Mr.P.P. Kakade for the Appellant. None for the Respondent. CORAM : H.L. GOKHALE & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ. DATE : 22ND AUGUST 2006 P.C. P.C. : P.C. 1. Heard Mr.Kotangale in support of this motion. None present for the Respondent though served. 2. Motion seeks condonation of delay of 173 days in filing the appeal. An affidavit in support has been filed giving explanation that the records were being transferred from one section to another and that caused the delay in filing the appeal. Though we are not much - 2 - impressed, we accept the explanation to avoid prejudice. Motion granted in terms of prayer (a). Delay is condoned. Appeal be listed for admission on 4th September 2006. (H.L. GOKHALE, J.) (J.P. DEVADHAR J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan