Munka Dall And Oil Mills Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
High Court
19 May 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Munka Dall And Oil Mills Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur
Date of order
19 May 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Munka Dall And Oil Mills Private Limited v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3395/2021
Munka Dall And Oil Mills Private Limited, Having Its RegisteredAddress At Flat No. 102, Sunshine Palm, Sikar Road, JaipurThrough Its Director Shri Sunil Kumar Agarwal.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jaipur-2, HavingIts Office At New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle,Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur.Its Office At New Central Revenue Building, Statue Circle,Bhagwan Das Road, C-Scheme, Jaipur.
2. Central Board Of Direct Taxes, New Delhi, Having ItsOffice At North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi -110001 Through Its Chairman.Office At North Block, Central Secretariat, New Delhi -110001 Through Its Chairman.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s)
For Respondent(s)
: Mr. Siddharth Ranka with
Ms. Apeksha Bapna &
Mr. Rohan Chatter
: Mr. Palash Gupta for Mr. Sandeep PathakMr. Sandeep Pathak
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT
19/05/2025
Order
Learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions submitsthat the petitioner has applied under the new Amnesty Scheme,seeks permission to withdraw the petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J
(AVNEESH JHINGAN),J
Riya/42
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue