Case LawHigh Court › Muthukumar Sivakami v. The Principal Com...

Muthukumar Sivakami v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax

High Court 23 Sep 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · hc_cis_mas
Parties
Muthukumar Sivakami v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
23 Sep 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Muthukumar Sivakami v. The Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS Dated : 23.09.2024 CORAM THE HON'BLE Mr. JUSTICE KRISHNAN RAMASAMY W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 & W.M.P.Nos.4238, 4241, 4242 & 4244 of 2023 Muthukumar Sivakami ... Petitioner in both petitions Vs. 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 008. Coimbatore 641 008. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Income Tax Office, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tirupur 641 602. ... Respondents in W.P.No.4204 of 2023 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 008. Coimbatore 641 008. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Income Tax Office, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tirupur 641 602. 1/9 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ministry of Finance, Income Tax Department, Delhi. ... Respondents in W.P.No.4207 of 2023 Prayer in W.P.No.4204 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 1[st ]respondent in DIN & Order No:ITBA/REV/F/REV5/2020-21/1029802090(1) relating to the order passed under Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the Assessment Year 2012-13 in PAN: dated 15.01.2021 and quash the same. Prayer in W.P.No.4207 of 2023: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying to issue a Writ of Certiorari, to call for the records of the 3[rd ]respondent in DIN & Order No.:ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/1042033993(1) relating to the order passed under Section 147 read with Section 263 read with Section 144B of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2012-13 in PAN: dated 30.03.2022 and quash the same. 2/9 For Petitionerin both petitions : Mr.T.Vasudevan For Respondentin both petitions : Dr.B.Ramaswamy, Senior Standing counsel COMMON ORDER These writ petitions have been filed challenging the impugned orders dated 15.01.2021 and 30.03.2022 passed by the respondents 1 and 3 respectively. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner's father had sold a property, which is an agricultural land, to a Real-Estate Agent, due to which, the petitioner had received a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in her bank accounts. With regard to the said deposit, a show cause notice was issued by the respondent, for which, a detailed reply was filed by the petitioner on 23.11.2018. Subsequently, 3/9 W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 the petitioner had also filed her return of income on 29.11.2018. Thereafter, the proceedings were dropped by the 1[st] respondent vide impugned order dated 15.01.2021, which is the subject matter of W.P.No.4204 of 2023. 3. Further, he would submit that after the passing of aforesaid order dated 15.01.2021, once again, the notices were sent by the 3[rd ]respondent, to the petitioner's consultant, calling for certain details. Since issuance of the said notices was not informed to the petitioner, she had failed to provide the details as sought by the 3[rd] respondent. Under these circumstances, the impugned assessment order dated 30.03.2022 came to be passed by the 3[rd] respondent, which is the subject matter of W.P.No.4207 of 2023. 4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the 3[rd] respondent had sent all the notices to the E-mail ID of the Consultant of the petitioner. However, since the whereabouts of the said Consultant was not known, the petitioner was unaware of the issuance of said notices, 4/9 W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 4. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the 3[rd] respondent had sent all the notices to the E-mail ID of the Consultant of the petitioner. However, since the whereabouts of the said Consultant was not known, the petitioner was unaware of the issuance of said notices, 4/9 W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 due to which, she had failed to file her reply. Under these circumstances, the impugned assessment order was passed by the 3[rd] respondent without providing any opportunity to the petitioner, which is violation of principles of natural justices. Hence, he requests this Court to pass appropriate orders to set aside both the impugned orders. 5. On the other hand, Dr.B.Ramaswamy, learned Senior Standing counsel, for the respondent would submit that the notices were sent to the E-mail ID, which was provided by the petitioner. However, after the passing of assessment order, the petitioner had intentionally changed their E-mail ID in the GST Portal. Hence, he made strong objection for setting aside the impugned orders and requests this Court to dismiss the present petitions. 6. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Senior Standing counsel for the respondents and also perused the materials available on record. 5/9 W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 7. In the present case, the issue is pertaining to the credit of sale proceeds of a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- in the petitioner's bank account. According to the petitioner, the property sold by her is an agricultural land and hence, she is entitled for exemption. However, the petitioner was unable to explain her case before the respondents, due to the confusions created by her Consultant. Under these circumstances, the ex-parte impugned order dated 30.03.2022 came to be passed by the 3[rd ]respondent. 8. Therefore, considering the genuine reasons assigned by the petitioner, for non-availment of opportunities provided by the respondents, this Court feels that it would be appropriate to provide one more opportunity to the petitioner to present her case before the respondents. In such view of the matter, this Court is inclined to set aside the impugned order dated 30.03.2022, which is the subject matter of W.P.No.4207 of 2023. Accordingly, this Court passes the following order:- 6/9 (i) The impugned order dated 30.03.2022 alone is set aside and the matter is remanded to the 3rd respondent for fresh consideration (ii) The petitioner shall file their reply/objection along with the required documents, if any, within a period of three weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. (iii) On filing of such reply/objection by the petitioner, the respondent shall consider the same and issue a 14 days clear notice, by fixing the date of personal hearing, to the petitioner and thereafter, pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law, after hearing the petitioner, as expeditiously as possible. 9. With the above directions, the writ petition, in W.P.No.4207 of 2023 is disposed of. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. 7/9 W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 10. As far as the impugned order dated 15.01.2021 is concerned, since this Court does not find any merits in the petition in W.P.No.4204 of 2023, this Court is inclined to dismiss the same. Accordingly, the writ petition No.4204 of 2023 is dismissed. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Speaking/Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NonsaTo 23.09.2024 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 008. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Income Tax Office, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tirupur 641 602. 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ministry of Finance, Income Tax Department, Delhi. 8/9 9/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa since this Court does not find any merits in the petition in W.P.No.4204 of 2023, this Court is inclined to dismiss the same. Accordingly, the writ petition No.4204 of 2023 is dismissed. No cost. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petitions are also closed. Speaking/Non-speaking orderIndex : Yes / NoNeutral Citation : Yes / NonsaTo 23.09.2024 1.The Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, No.63, Race Course Road, Coimbatore 641 008. 2.The Income Tax Officer, Ward 1(4), Income Tax Office, No.121, Adams Building, Sixty Feet Road, Tirupur 641 602. 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Ministry of Finance, Income Tax Department, Delhi. 8/9 9/9 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023 KRISHNAN RAMASAMY.J., nsa W.P.Nos.4204 & 4207 of 2023& W.M.P.Nos.4238, 4241, 4242 & 4244 of 2023 23.09.2024
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan