Case LawHigh Court › M.venkata Prasad, Gangaiah Complex, 8-24...

M.venkata Prasad, Gangaiah Complex, 8-24 v. Oral Judgment

High Court 04 Feb 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · aphc
Parties
M.venkata Prasad, Gangaiah Complex, 8-24 v. Oral Judgment
Date of order
04 Feb 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In M.venkata Prasad, Gangaiah Complex, 8-24 v. Oral Judgment, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Bhanumathi) Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH AND HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION No.881 OF 2004 M.Venkata Prasad, Gangaiah Complex, 8-24-121, Opp: One Town Police Station, Main Road, Rajahmundry 533 101. … Petitioner Versus 1 The Income Tax Officer, Ward- 4, Rajahmundry 533 101. Ward- 4, Rajahmundry 533 101. 2 The Executive Engineer, Valuation Cell, Income Tax Department, 6th Floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam-530 020. Income Tax Department, 6th Floor, Ayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam-530 020. 3 The Superintending Engineer(Valuation), Valuation Cell, Income Tax Department, 3rd Floor, 616, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 500 001. Income Tax Department, 3rd Floor, 616, Ayakar Bhavan, Basheerbagh, Hyderabad 500 001. 4 The Commissioner of Income Tax, Ayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam-530 020. Ayakar Bhavan, Daba Gardens, Visakhapatnam-530 020. … Respondents ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04.02.2022 (Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi) Mr. Kailashnath P. S. S, learned counsel representing Mr. N. R. Sivaswamy, learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. 2.Ms. M. Kiranmayee, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the Income Tax, is present. 3.Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. There shall be no order as to costs. 4.Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, also stand disposed of. of. ________________________________ (AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J) ________________________ (B. S. BHANUMATHI, J) Pab Pab HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH AND HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE B. S. BHANUMATHI WRIT PETITION No.881 OF 2004 Date : 04.02.2022 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MAIN CASE No.: WRIT PETITION No.881 OF 2004 PROCEEDING SHEETSl.OFFICE ORDER No DATE NOTE 1. 04.02.2022 AHSANUDDIN AMANULLAH, J and B. S. BHANUMATHI, J(Per Hon’ble Ms. Justice B. S. Bhanumathi) Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (vide separate judgment) (B/o) Pab
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan