Nafr v. Cause-Title Taken From Case Information System

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR TAXC No. 85 of 2024 Hitesh Golchha S/o Late Gautam Chand Golchha, Aged About 41Years Proprietor Of Mouli Investments, R/o Jeevan Ganga Near DaniBada, Budha Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin - 492001. Hitesh Golchha S/o Late Gautam Chand Golchha, Aged About 41Years Proprietor Of Mouli Investments, R/o Jeevan Ganga Near DaniBada, Budha Para, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Pin - 492001. ---- Appellant Versus Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1 Raipur,Office Its At Aayaker Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh,492001. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax Central Circle-1 Raipur,Office Its At Aayaker Bhawan, Civil Lines, Raipur, Chhattisgarh,492001. ---- Respondent (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Appellant For Respondent : Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, holding the brief ofMr. Apurv Goyal, Advocate. :Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Smt. Rajani Dubey, Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice12/04/2024 1. Heard Mr. Soumitra Kesharwani, learned counsel for the appellant aswell as Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, learned counsel for the respondent.well as Ms. Naushina Afrin Ali, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Challenge in this appeal is to the order dated 02.11.2023 passed bythe learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 101, 102, 103,104/RPR/2022 by which the appeal preferred by theappellant/assessee have been partly allowed.the learned Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No. 101, 102, 103,104/RPR/2022 by which the appeal preferred by theappellant/assessee have been partly allowed. 3. At the outset, it has been pointed out by the learned counselappearing for the parties that two tax appeals being TAXC No. 76 ofappearing for the parties that two tax appeals being TAXC No. 76 of Amit 2024 and TAXC No. 79/2024, involving similar issues and facts, havebeen disposed of by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 10.04.2024and as such, this appeal may also be disposed of in the same terms. 4. In view of the above submission, this appeal also stands disposedof in terms of the order passed in TAXC No. 76 of 2024 and 79/2024of in terms of the order passed in TAXC No. 76 of 2024 and 79/2024 by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court on 10.04.2024. Sd/- Sd/- (Rajani Dubey) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice