Case LawHigh Court › Nafr v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax...

Nafr v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range

High Court 13 May 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · cghccisdb
Parties
Nafr v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range
Date of order
13 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nafr v. Joint Commissioner Of Income Tax, Range, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Decision: 3.Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed on withdrawal.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 210 of 2022 NAFR Smt. Vidhya Nagdeo, W/o Shri Tikam Das Nagdeo, Aged about 63 years,Proprietor of Shri Yash Industries, Having office at, NH 130, Main Road,Post Bodri, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.) ---- Appellant Versus 1.Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, Range 1, Bilaspur, Income TaxDepartment, Aayakar Bhawan, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur- 495001, Chhattisgarh. Department, Aayakar Bhawan, Vyapar Vihar, Bilaspur, DistrictBilaspur- 495001, Chhattisgarh. 2.The Income Tax Officer / Assessing Officer Having office at, Ward2(1), Vyapar Vihar, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 2(1), Vyapar Vihar, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh. 3.National Faceless Assessment Centre, Through Additional/Joint/Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer,Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance (GoI), Room No. 356C.R. Building, IP Estate, New Delhi, Delhi-110002. Deputy/Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax/Income Tax Officer,Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance (GoI), Room No. 356C.R. Building, IP Estate, New Delhi, Delhi-110002. ---- Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For AppellantFor Respondents : Mr. Ankit Singhal, Advocate. :Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate. Mr. Ajay Kumrani, Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant, Judge Order on Board Per Arup Kumar Goswami, Chief Justice 13.05.2022 By relying on I.A. No. 2 of 2022, Mr. Ankit Singhal, learned counselfor the appellant, prays for withdrawal of the writ appeal. 2.Mr. Ajay Kumrani, learned counsel, appearing for the respondents, is present and has no objection. 3.Accordingly, this writ appeal is dismissed on withdrawal. 4.I.A. No. 2 of 2022 stands disposed of. Sd/- Sd/- (Arup Kumar Goswami)(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Chief Justice Judge
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan