Nafr13/10/2025 Sharda/Mmcp.02 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jharkhand
High Court
13 Oct 2025 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Nafr13/10/2025 Sharda/Mmcp.02 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jharkhand
Date of order
13 Oct 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Nafr13/10/2025 Sharda/Mmcp.02 v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Jharkhand, the High Court (2025) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Durgesh Agarwal, AC to Sr.S.C. --------- 07/Dated: 13.10.2025 Since the petitioner hasanefficacious and alternative remedy of filing appeal against the impugned order, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed as not maintainable, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as availa...
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
NAFR13/10/2025 Sharda/MMCp.02
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(T) No. 3305 of 2024
Bokaro Steel Employees Opn Mills Zone Co-Operative Credit Society Limited, A Co-operative Society incorporated under the Jharkhand State Co-operative Societies Act 1935 having its Office at HRCF Bokaro Steel City, Sector-2, Bokaro, Jharkhand-827001 through its Chairman Shri. Sharad Gupta( Male, aged about 57 years) Son of Late Shri. Shridas Gupta, resident of Plot No. JB-18, City Centre, Sector-4, Bokaro Steel City, PO-Bokaro Steel City, PS-Bokaro Steel City, District- Bokaro Jharkhand-827004... ... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Jharkhand having its office at Aykar Bhawan, 5 Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. Ranchi, P.S.- Chutia, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001 at Aykar Bhawan, 5 Main Road, Ranchi, P.O. Ranchi, P.S.- Chutia, Ranchi, Jharkhand-834001
2. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Ramgarh, Income Tax Office Srizee Sadan, Thana Chowk, P.O.- Ramgarh, P.S.- Ramgarh, Jharkhand-839122 … ... Respondents Srizee Sadan, Thana Chowk, P.O.- Ramgarh, P.S.- Ramgarh, Jharkhand-839122 … ... Respondents
---------
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR
---------
For the Petitioner : Mr.D.V. Pathy, Sr. Advocate Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Respondents: Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Sr.S.C. Mr. Durgesh Agarwal, AC to Sr.S.C. ---------
07/Dated: 13.10.2025
Since the petitioner hasanefficacious and alternative remedy of filing appeal against the impugned order, therefore, the instant petition is dismissed as not maintainable, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail such remedy as available to it under the law.
(Tarlok Singh Chauhan, C.J.)
(Rajesh Shankar, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.