Case Law › High Court › Nagendra Kumar v. The Union Of India

Nagendra Kumar v. The Union Of India

High Court 28 Apr 2010 In favour of: Assessee

Forum / Bench

High Court · patnahcucisdb94

Parties

Date of order

28 Apr 2010

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Allowed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Nagendra Kumar v. The Union Of India, the High Court (2010) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA MJC No.1203 of 2010 1.NAGENDRA KUMAR, S/O LATE BRAHMDEO SINHA, R/O LIG 12/425, HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. KANKARBAGH, AT AND DISTT.- PATNA. HANUMAN NAGAR, P.S. KANKARBAGH, AT AND DISTT.- PATNA. -------- Petitioner Versus 1.THE UNION OF INDIA THROUGH THE COMMISSIONER, INCOME TAX (APPEALS), PATNA. (APPEALS), PATNA. 2.THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(3), 3RD FLOOR, LOKNAYAK BHAWAN, FRAZER ROAD, PATNA. BHAWAN, FRAZER ROAD, PATNA. ---------- Respondents ----------- 2 28.04.2010 This is an application for modification of an order dated 16.3.2010 passed by this Court in C.W.J.C. No. 4480 of 2010. Mr. Harshwardhan Prasad, learned counsel for the opposite parties has fairly stated that he has no objection if the order dated 16.3.2010 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 4480 of 2010 is recalled and accordingly it is so ordered. M.J.C. is accordingly allowed. (Dipak Misra, CJ.) Rishi (Mihir Kumar Jha, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.