In Nair Smita v. Chandresh, the High Court (2020) dismissed the appeal.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
C/CA/1612/2020 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1612 of 2020In F/TAX APPEAL NO. 2190 of 2020
With F/TAX APPEAL NO. 2190 of 2020==========================================================AVLON SYNTEX PRIVATE LIMITED VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(1)(1)
==========================================================
Appearance:MS VAIBHAVI K PARIKH(3238) for the Applicant(s) No. 1 for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE MR. VIKRAM NATHandHONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA
Date : 16/09/2020 ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE J.B.PARDIWALA)
Ms. Vaibhavi Parikh, the learned counsel appearing for the appellantsubmits that she has instructions from her client not to press this TaxAppeal as her client wants to avail the benefits of the ‘Vivad SeVishwas Scheme’.
In view of such statement being made by Ms. Parikh, this Tax Appealstands dismissed as not pressed. We clarify that we have otherwisenot gone into the merits of the matter. As the Tax Appeal is dismissedas not pressed, the connected civil application seeking condonation ofdelay would also not survive and the same stands disposed of.
(VIKRAM NATH, CJ)
NAIR SMITA V. / CHANDRESH
(J. B. PARDIWALA, J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.