Namit Agarwal (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
High Court
10 Jul 2023 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Namit Agarwal (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle
Date of order
10 Jul 2023
Assessment year(s)
2013-14
Outcome
Dismissed
Case summary
In Namit Agarwal (Ay 2013-14) v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 16731/2022
Namit Agarwal (AY 2013-14) S/o Late Shri Rajendra PrasadAgarwal, Aged About 51 Years, Resident Of 71, 3Rd Floor, ShriGopal Nagar, Gopalpura Bypass, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302018
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle - 6, NCRBuilding, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302005Building, Bhagwan Das Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan - 302005
2. Union Of India, Through Its Secretary, Central Board OfDirect Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (NCT)-110001Direct Taxes, Department Of Revenue, Ministry OfFinance, North Block, New Delhi (NCT)-110001
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vedant Agrawal, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mr. Arnav Singh, Advocate for For Respondent(s): Mr. Arnav Singh, Advocate for
Mr. Sandeep Pathak, Advocate
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Judgment / Order
10/07/2023
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw thepetition in view of subsequent event.
Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
Mohita /262
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue