Nand Kishore Saini v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kota,Rajasthan.rajasthan
High Court
27 Jan 2022 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Nand Kishore Saini v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kota,Rajasthan.rajasthan
Date of order
27 Jan 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Nand Kishore Saini v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kota,Rajasthan.rajasthan, the High Court (2022) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: With the liberty to take remedy availableunder the law, writ petition is dismissed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1233/2022
Nand Kishore Saini S/o Shri Surajmal Saini, Aged About 33Years, Sole Proprietor Of M/s Jai Sawariya Enterprises Nanta PipliChoraha Nanta, Kota
----Petitioner
Versus
1. The Income Tax Officer, National Faceless AssessmentCentre Income Tax Department Ministry Of Finance RoomNumber 401 2Nd Floor Near Jawaharlal Nehru StadiumDelhi Centre Income Tax Department Ministry Of Finance RoomNumber 401 2Nd Floor Near Jawaharlal Nehru StadiumDelhi
2. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle-2, Kota,Rajasthan.Rajasthan.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Prateek Kedawat through V.C.For Respondent(s):
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR
27/01/2022
Order
Heard.
This petition has been filed against the assessment orderwhich has been passed by Assessing Authority on several groundsincluding the grounds that the assessment has not been carriedout strictly in accordance with the provisions prescribed in Section144B (7) and Section 144B (9) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Hewould also submit that the issue of the legality and validity of suchan assessment could be examined by the writ Court itself on thebasis of the provisions contained in the Act. In support of his
submission learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon orderspassed by other High Courts.
Without commenting upon the merits of the case, as there isefficaious remedy of filing a statutory appeal before the Authorityand that the jurisdiction of the Authority who has passedimpugned order is not under challenge nor it is a case where theallegation of mala fide has been levelled, we are not inclined tointerfere with the order. With the liberty to take remedy availableunder the law, writ petition is dismissed.
(BIRENDRA KUMAR),J(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),J
ashu /18
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.