Case LawHigh Court › Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati,...

Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate

High Court 31 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate
Date of order
31 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal.

Decision: In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

The order — as passed by the High Court

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5001/2022 Nand Lal Khanchandani S/o Harial Das, Aged About 64 Years,Resident Of 149 Sindhi Colony Bani Park Jaipur Rajasthan302016. ----Petitioner Versus Office Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1,JPR, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan, 302005. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Banshi Dhar Badaya, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate with Mr. N.S. Bhati, Advocate HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAINJudgment / Order 31/03/2022 Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit thatthe issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it has beenput to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decision renderedon 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) &Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) wherethe notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 havebeen found to be invalid and impermissible in law and quashed. In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed. (SAMEER JAIN),J (MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan