Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate
High Court
31 Mar 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate
Date of order
31 Mar 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nand Lal Khanchandani v. Mr. N.s. Bhati, Advocate, the High Court (2022) allowed the appeal.
Decision: In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Sections referenced in this judgment
The order — as passed by the High Court
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5001/2022
Nand Lal Khanchandani S/o Harial Das, Aged About 64 Years,Resident Of 149 Sindhi Colony Bani Park Jaipur Rajasthan302016.
----Petitioner
Versus
Office Of The Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Circle 1,JPR, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Dass Road, Jaipur,Rajasthan, 302005.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Banshi Dhar Badaya, AdvocateFor Respondent(s): Mr. Anuroop Singhi, Advocate with
Mr. N.S. Bhati, Advocate
HON'BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MR. MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAINJudgment / Order
31/03/2022
Learned counsel for the petitioner at the outset would submit thatthe issue involved in this petition is no longer res integra as it has beenput to an end by Division Bench of this Court in the decision renderedon 27.01.2022 in Sudesh Taneja Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(3) &Anr. (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 969/2022 and batch of petitions) wherethe notices issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 havebeen found to be invalid and impermissible in law and quashed.
In view of the above statement made by learned counsel for thepetitioner, the impugned notice issued in the present case, for thereasons stated in the order dated 27.01.2022 passed in the aforesaidcases, is also quashed and set aside and the petition is allowed.
(SAMEER JAIN),J
(MANINDRA MOHAN SHRIVASTAVA),ACTING CJ
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.