Case LawHigh Court › Nandlal Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Thr...

Nandlal Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p

High Court 10 Feb 2017 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Nandlal Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p
Date of order
10 Feb 2017
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Nandlal Sharma v. State Of Rajasthan Through P.p, the High Court (2017) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FORRAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B.Cr. Misc. Petition No. 760/2017. Nandlal Sharma S/o Sh. Banshidhar Sharma, Aged About 62 Years, R/o L 54, Income Tax Colony, Tonk Road, Durgapura, Jaipur, Raj. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan Through P.P. 2. Vinita Sharma W/o Sh. Ninad Sharma, D/o Sh. Vijay Kumar Sharma, R/o 14, A.R.S.E.B. Colony, D Block, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur, Raj. For Petitioner(s) : Shri Sanjay Sharma For State : Shri R.R. Gurjar For Respondent (s) : Shri V.R. Bajwa HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SABINA Order 10/2/2017 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits hemay be permitted to withdraw the petition to enablethe petitioner to take up all the pleas available to himbefore the trial court. Ordered accordingly. However, personal appearance of the petitioner before the trial court shall remain exempted subject tothe following conditions:- i. petitioner shall be represented through counsel; ii. shall not delay/stall the trial proceedings; iii. Shall not dispute his identity as accused; iv. shall have no objection if the prosecution evidenceis recorded in his absence but in the presence of hiscounsel; v. shall appear before the Trial Court as and whenrequired by the Trial Court; vi. any other condition which the learned Trial Courtmay impose. (SABINA)J. Mrg.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan