Case LawHigh Court › Narender Kumar Dhand v. Income Tax Offic...

Narender Kumar Dhand v. Income Tax Officer & Anr

High Court 08 May 2024 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Narender Kumar Dhand v. Income Tax Officer & Anr
Date of order
08 May 2024
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Narender Kumar Dhand v. Income Tax Officer & Anr, the High Court (2024) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

Sections referenced in this judgment

$~10 IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + W.P.(C) 1395/2024, CM APPL. 5756/2024(Direction) & CM APPL. 12461/2024(Direction) NARENDER KUMAR DHAND ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Prince Mohan Sinha, Mr. Maneesh Jain, Mr. Shiv Nath B. and Mr. Aniket Krishnatrey, Adv. versus INCOME TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Puneet Rai, SSC along with Mr. Rishabh Nangia and Mr. Ashvini Kumar, SCs and Mr. Nikhil Jain, Adv. CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV O R D E R% 08.05.2024 1.This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs:- “i) A writ or order or directions in the nature of certiorari thereby directing the Respondents to quash the impugned order dated 13.04.2022 under Section l48A(d) of the Income Tax Act and Notice under Section 148 dated 23.03.2022 of the Act is also be quashed; ii) A writ or order or directions in the nature of certiorari thereby directing the Respondents not to take any action against the Petitioner; iii) pass any other or further order(s) as this Hon'b1e Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 2.Bearing in mind the fact that the petitioner had chosen to approach this Court only in 2024 in respect of a notice which had been issued as far back as in April 2022, we had called upon the petitioner to file an affidavit to explain the evident laches. Although no affidavit has been filed, the petitioner has moved an application in which it is sought to be contended that the petitioner-assessee was undergoing medical treatment and had remained under the observation of a doctor upto 08 November 2023. 3.Bearing the specious and unsubstantiated character of the explanation which has been proffered, we find no justification to entertain the writ petition. 4.It shall consequently stand dismissed with liberty reserved to the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. the petitioner to take appropriate steps in accordance with law. 5.All rights and contentions of parties on merits are kept open. YASHWANT VARMA, J. MAY 08, 2024/RW PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J.
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Defend a reassessment (Sec 148) notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan