Narendra Kumar Nigam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
High Court
07 Aug 2024 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · jaipur
Parties
Narendra Kumar Nigam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle
Date of order
07 Aug 2024
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Narendra Kumar Nigam v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle, the High Court (2024) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: Accordingly, this petition is also allowed in similar terms withliberty as stated in that case.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
BENCH AT JAIPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 3651/2021
Narendra Kumar Nigam S/o Kailash Narayan Nigam, Aged About72 Years, R/o 704, Fountain Square, Near Jawahar Circle,Malviya Nagar, Jaipur 302017.
----Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner Of Income Tax, Central Circle 4, Jaipur,Income Tax, New Central Revenue Building, Bhagwan Das Road,Jaipur, Rajasthan 302005.
----Respondent
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nilimesh Sen for
Mr. Prakul Khurana
For Respondent(s): Mr. Siddharth Bapna
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PANKAJ BHANDARI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGARJudgment / Order
07/08/2024
Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit that the issueraised in this petition is squarely covered by common order dated19.03.2024 passed by Division Bench of this Court in the case ofShyam Sunder Khandelwal Vs. Assistant Commissioner ofIncome Tax (D.B.Civil Writ Petition No.18363/2019 andother connected writ petitions).
Accordingly, this petition is also allowed in similar terms withliberty as stated in that case.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J(PANKAJ BHANDARI),J
Sudha/63
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue