Narendra Singh Choudhary v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dhanbad
High Court
17 Mar 2025 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · jhar_pg
Parties
Narendra Singh Choudhary v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dhanbad
Date of order
17 Mar 2025
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Narendra Singh Choudhary v. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Dhanbad, the High Court (2025) decided the matter.
Decision: Since the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under Section 249 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the assessment order, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy, this writ petition is disposed of.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P (T) No. 2205 of 2024
Narendra Singh Choudhary, aged about 65 years, S/o late Rajendra Singh Choudhary, resident of Village Kelia Dabur, PO & PS-Pindrajora, Chas District: Bokaro-827013
.....Petitioner
Versus
1. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax, Dhanbad, having its office at Aaykar Bhawan, PO & PS-Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad 2. Income Tax Officer, Ward 2(3), Ramgarh, having its office at Income Tax Office, PO & PS-Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh
....Respondents
-----
CORAM: HON’BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN
----
For the Petitioner
: Mr. Bhanu Giri, Advocate Mr. Sushant Kumar, Advocate : Mr. Kumar Vaibhav, Advocate Mr. Anurag Vijay, Advocate
For the Respondent-ITD
Mr. Srijan, Advocate
---
07/ Dated: 17.03.2025
1. Since the petitioner has an effective alternative remedy in the form of an appeal under Section 249 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 challenging the assessment order, granting liberty to the petitioner to avail the said remedy, this writ petition is disposed of.
2. Pending I.As, if any, also stands closed.
(M. S. Ramachandra Rao, C.J.)
(Deepak Roshan, J.)
Jk/Amit
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue