Naresh Behl v. Income Tax Officer Ward
High Court
05 Mar 2020 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Naresh Behl v. Income Tax Officer Ward
Date of order
05 Mar 2020
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Naresh Behl v. Income Tax Officer Ward, the High Court (2020) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~37.
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 2499/2020 and C.M. No. 8724/2020
NARESH BEHL
..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Kumar, Mr. Sudhir Chand Srivastava and Mr. Hemant Kumar, Advocates.
versus
1. INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD NO. 35(8)
OFFICE OF THE INCOME TAX & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Kunal Sharma and Ms. Zehra
Khan, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
%
O R D E R05.03.2020
Learned counsel for the respondent states that the Assessing Officer has passed the order u/s 220(6) of the Income Tax Act requiring the petitioner to make deposit of 20% of the tax demand. He has tendered in Court a copy of the said order dated 31.01.2020 and also furnished a copy to learned counsel for the petitioner. The same is taken on record.
In view of the aforesaid, this petition has become infructuous. Disposed of as such.
VIPIN SANGHI, J
MARCH 05, 2020 B.S. Rohella
SANJEEV NARULA, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue