Naresh Kumar Gattani v. The Assessing Authority, National Faceless Assessmentcentre, North Block, New Delhi
High Court
04 May 2022 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · rhcjodh240618
Parties
Naresh Kumar Gattani v. The Assessing Authority, National Faceless Assessmentcentre, North Block, New Delhi
Date of order
04 May 2022
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Naresh Kumar Gattani v. The Assessing Authority, National Faceless Assessmentcentre, North Block, New Delhi, the High Court (2022) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN ATJODHPUR
D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 6197/2022
Naresh Kumar Gattani, Aged About 55 Years, 3, Main Sector,Shastri Nagar, Bhilwara, 311001- Rajasthan.
----Petitioner
Versus
1. Income Tax Officer, Bhilwara, Ward-1, Bhilwara Rajasthan2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income-TaxDepartment, Aaykar Bhawan Savina Udaipur (Rajasthan)2. Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax, Income-TaxDepartment, Aaykar Bhawan Savina Udaipur (Rajasthan)
3. The Assessing Authority, National Faceless AssessmentCentre, North Block, New Delhi-110001.Centre, North Block, New Delhi-110001.
----Respondents
For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ravi Bhansali, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Prateek Gattani and Mr. Falgun Buchassisted by Mr. Prateek Gattani and Mr. Falgun BuchFor Respondent(s): -
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MEHTA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI
04/05/2022
Order
After arguing the matter at great length, Mr. Ravi
Bhansali, learned Senior Advocate, representing the petitioner,craves liberty to withdraw the instant writ petition, which isdisposed of as such.
(VINOD KUMAR BHARWANI),J
(SANDEEP MEHTA),J
96-Pramod/-
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.