In Naroli Developers v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: The Tax Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1002 of 2011With CIVIL APPLICATION (FOR WITHDRAWAL OF MATTER) NO. 1 of 2021 In R/TAX APPEAL NO. 1002 of 2011
==========================================================
NAROLI DEVELOPERS
VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR MANISH J SHAH(1320) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDIand
HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE ASHOKKUMAR C. JOSHI
Date : 07/06/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE BELA M. TRIVEDI)
1.
Learned advocate Mr. Manish J. Shah appearing for the appellant seeks permission to withdraw the present Tax Appeal in view of the Civil Application No. 1 of 2021 filed in the said Appeal. Mr. Shah submitted that the appellant has chosen to file a declaration under Section 4 of the Direct Tax Vivaad Se Vishwas Act 2020 to settle the tax dispute pending the present Appeal and accordingly his declaration has been processed under Section 5 of the said Act and is required to withdraw the present Appeal in view of Section 4(3) of the said Act.
2.In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on the substantial question of law
C/TAXAP/1002/2011 ORDER DATED: 07/06/2021
framed by the Court at the time of admission of the Tax Appeal, learned advocate Mr. Manish J. Shah for the appellant is permitted to withdraw the present Tax Appeal as prayed for.
3. The Tax Appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. The Civil Application also stands disposed of accordingly.
(BELA M. TRIVEDI, J)
AMAR SINGH
(A. C. JOSHI,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.