Case LawHigh Court › Nathalal Dahyabhai v. Commissioner Of In...

Nathalal Dahyabhai v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax

High Court 04 Jul 2002 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Nathalal Dahyabhai v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax
Date of order
04 Jul 2002
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Allowed

Case summary

In Nathalal Dahyabhai v. Commissioner Of Income-Tax, the High Court (2002) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.

Issue: Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NATHALAL DAHYABHAI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No 191 of 1988 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and Hon'ble MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed : NO to see the judgements? 2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? : NO 3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy : NO of the judgement? 4. Whether this case involves a substantial question : NO of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? 5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? : NO -------------------------------------------------------------- NATHALAL DAHYABHAI Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX -------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance: 1. INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 191 of 1988 SERVED BY RPAD - (N) for Petitioner No. 1 MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent No. 1 -------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH and MR.JUSTICE K.A.PUJ Date of decision: 04/07/2002 ORAL JUDGEMENT (Per : MR.JUSTICE M.S.SHAH) �Mr Manish R Bhatt, learned senior standing counsel appears for the respondent-Commissioner of Income-tax, Ahmedabad. �This is a reference at the instance of the assessee. Though served, none appears for the applicant-assessee nor is any paper book filed. �Since the reference is pending since 1988 and none appears for the applicant-assessee in the reference at the instance of the assessee, we decline to answer the question/s and dispose of the reference accordingly. �The reference accordingly stands disposed of. ��(M.S. Shah, J.)�(K.A. Puj, J.) sundar/-
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan