Natwarsinh R Chauhan v. Income Tax Officer
High Court
23 Apr 2021 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · gujarathc
Parties
Natwarsinh R Chauhan v. Income Tax Officer
Date of order
23 Apr 2021
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In Natwarsinh R Chauhan v. Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2021) decided the matter.
Decision: Acceding to the request, the Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed, without entering into the merits and expressing any opinion.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
C/TAXAP/40/2009 ORDER
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 40 of 2009
With
R/TAX APPEAL NO. 41 of 2009
==========================================================NATWARSINH R CHAUHAN VersusINCOME TAX OFFICER
==========================================================
Appearance:
HARI K BRAHMBHATT(9070) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MR TUSHAR P HEMANI(2790) for the Appellant(s) No. 1MRS KALPANAK RAVAL(1046) for the Opponent(s) No. 1==========================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANIand
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI
Date : 23/04/2021
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE SONIA GOKANI)
Learned Advocate Mr. Brahmbhatt, appearing for the appellant has sought the permission of withdrawal of this Tax Appeal as the appellant is desirous to avail the benefit under the Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme.
Acceding to the request, the Tax Appeal is disposed of as not pressed, without entering into the merits and expressing any opinion.
If for some reasons, the appellant is unable to avail the benefit of the scheme, it shall be open for the appellant to take legal recourse, which will also include the revival of the appeal if requested within
a period of six months.
NEHA
(SONIA GOKANI, J)
(VAIBHAVI D. NANAVATI,J)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.