Nav Dariya Mahal Cooperative Housing Societi Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2)(1), Mumbai
High Court
04 Sep 2009 In favour of: Assessee
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Nav Dariya Mahal Cooperative Housing Societi Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2)(1), Mumbai
Date of order
04 Sep 2009
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Allowed
Case summary
In Nav Dariya Mahal Cooperative Housing Societi Limited v. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2)(1), Mumbai, the High Court (2009) allowed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the assessee.
Decision: All the appeals are thus disposed of with no order as to costs.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1439 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1440 OF 2007ANDINCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1441 OF 2007
Nav Dariya Mahal Cooperative Housing Societi Limited
..Appellant.
Versus
The Income Tax Officer, Ward 16(2)(1), Mumbai
..Respondent.
Mr.G.S. Pikale i/by M/s.S.V. Pikale & Co. for the appellant.Mr.P.S. Sahadevan for the respondent.
CORAM : V.C. DAGA & J.P. DEVADHAR, JJ.
DATE : 4TH SEPTEMBER 2009
P.C. :
1.These appeals were admitted on 11-2-2009 on the following substantial questions of law :
a)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal erred in holding that the contribution to Common Amenity Fund / Repairs & Welfare Fund being the first contribution made by the existing / new member is chargeable to tax and is not governed by the Principles of Mutuality ?
b)Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal erred in holding that the contribution to Common Amenity Fund / Repairs & Welfare Fund being the first contribution made by the existing / new member is transfer fee as in the case of Walkeshwar Triveni Cooperative Housing Society Limited V/s. I.T.O. 267 ITR 86 (AT) (SB) ?
2.The questions sought to be raised in these appeals are covered by the Division Bench judgment of this Court in group of matters lead Appeal being Income Tax Appeal No.931 of 2004 (Sind Cooperative Housing Society V/s. IncomeTax Officer, Ward 1(7), Pune) decided on July 17, 2009.
3.In this view of the matter, all the appeals are allowed. The questions are accordingly answered in favour of the assessee and against the revenue. All the appeals are thus disposed of with no order as to costs.
(J.P. Devadhar, J.)
(V.C. Daga, J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.