Case LawHigh Court › Navi Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer

Navi Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer

High Court 26 Apr 2011 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Navi Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer
Date of order
26 Apr 2011
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

The order — as passed by the High Court

Case summary

In Navi Mumbai v. The Income Tax Officer, the High Court (2011) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTIONNOTICE OF MOTION NO. 419 OF 2011 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 126 OF 2011 M/s. Strides Arcolab Ltd., Navi Mumbai..Appellant Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward 10(3)(4), Mumbai .. Respondent Mr. Atul K. Jasani for the Appellant.Ms. Padma Divakar for the Respondent. CORAM : J.P. DEVADHAR AND A.A. SAYED, JJ. DATE : 26TH APRIL, 2011. P.C. By consent notice of motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). ( A.A. SAYED, J. ) (J.P. DEVADHAR, J.)
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan