Navin R.kamani (Huf v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
High Court
07 Aug 2008 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · newos
Parties
Navin R.kamani (Huf v. Commissioner Of Income Tax
Date of order
07 Aug 2008
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Navin R.kamani (Huf v. Commissioner Of Income Tax, the High Court (2008) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.267 OF 1997
INCOME TAX REFERENCE NO.267 OF 1997
Navin R.Kamani (HUF) .. Applicant
Vs.
Commissioner of Income Tax .. Respondent
Mr.S.S.Shetty for the Applicant.
None for the Respondent.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN & S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
CORAM :- DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN &
S.J.KATHAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : 7th August, 2008
DATE : 7th August, 2008
P.C.
P.C.
P.C.
. Mr.Shetty, the learned Counsel for the Applicant
states that the Applicant is not keen to proceed with
the Reference. Hence, the Reference is returned back
unanswered.
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
(S.J.KATHAWALLA, J.) (DR.S.RADHAKRISHNAN,J.)
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue