Case LawHigh Court › Ndhra Pradesh.compound, Visakhapatnam, A...

Ndhra Pradesh.compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh v. The Court Made The Following: Order

High Court 05 Jan 2023 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · taphc
Parties
Ndhra Pradesh.compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh v. The Court Made The Following: Order
Date of order
05 Jan 2023
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Dismissed

Case summary

In Ndhra Pradesh.compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh v. The Court Made The Following: Order, the High Court (2023) dismissed the appeal.

Decision: Foliowing the aforesaid order, the [present Writ]Petition is also dismissed.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

I t [3311 ][l] o* o HIGH [couRr' ]?1 llB:Itl'^S: lEL:*o (SPecial [Original ][Jurisdlcttonl] THURSDAY .NI'IO ,THE iITOUSNND PRESENT THE HONOURABLE ANDTHE HONOURABLE [JUSTICE N.TUKARAMJI] WRIT PETITIO [N NO: 19190 ][0F ][2008] Between: lncome Tai, [(Central) ][Aayakar ][Bhavan,]...PETITIONER The Commissioner [of]Basheerbagh, Hyderabad. AND 1. The lncome Tax Settlment Commission, [Additional ][Bench, ][640, Anna ][Salai,]Nandanam, Chennai.Nandanam, Chennai. 2. M/s. Sai Dharsan Media Network Private Limited, 9-1-22211, [C.B.M.]Compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh.Compound, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh. ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Arlicle 226 of the Constitution of lndia [praying ]that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may [be]circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may [be]pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order ordirection in the nature of a Writ of declaring the order of the SettlementCommission (lT & WT), Additional Bench, Chennai in SA No.AP/HD51/06-0712}fi daled 18-3-2008 as highly illegal, improper, arbitrary,unjust, violative of the principles of natural [justice ]and to set aside the samel.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 25023 OF 20081Commission (lT & WT), Additional Bench, Chennai in SA No.AP/HD51/06-0712}fi daled 18-3-2008 as highly illegal, improper, arbitrary,unjust, violative of the principles of natural [justice ]and to set aside the samel.A. NO: 1 OF 2008(WPMP. NO: 25023 OF 20081 Petition under Section ['151 ]CPC praying that in the circumstances statedin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased toin the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased tosuspend the order of the Settlement Commission (lT & WT), Additional Bench,Chennai in SA No. AP/HD51/06-07l23llT daled 18-3-2008, pending disposat ofthe writ petrtionChennai in SA No. AP/HD51/06-07l23llT daled 18-3-2008, pending disposat ofthe writ petrtion Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. J. V. PRASAD (SC FOR INCOME TAX)Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR INCOME TAXCounsel forthe Respondent No.2: M/s. A. PRABHAVATI FOR R.S. ASSOCIATES The Court made the following: ORDER THE HON'B LE THE CHIEF JUSTICE UJJAL BHUYAN AND THE Hpx,BrE SBIJUSTICE N. TUKARAMJT IVEII [IETIIIoN ]No.19l9o of 2ooB ORDER: (Per the Hon'ble the Chief Justice tJjjal Bhugan) Heard Mr. Ajay Kulkarni, learned counsel representingMr. J.V.Prasad. learneci Standing Counsel, Income TaxDepartment for the petitioner and Ms. A.Prabhavati, learnedcounsel for respondent No.2 2. Challenge made in this writ petition is to the [order]dated 18,03.2008 passecl by the Settlement [Commission.]Commissioner of Income Tax is the [petitioner ][in ][this ][writ]petition. 3. Similar challenge made by the [Revenue ][in]W.P.No. l9l92 of 2008 was [dismissed on ][03.01.2023.] 4 . Foliowing the aforesaid order, the [present Writ]Petition is also dismissed. However, there shall be no orderas to costs. 2 HC] & NTRJW. P.No. 191 9O.of 2OO8 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, ifany, in this Writ Petition, shall stand closed. Sd/-MOHD SANAULLAH ANSARIASSITANTB,EGISTRAR//TRUE COPY// crpSECTION OFFICER To, 1. Two CCs to GP FOR INCOME TAX ,High Court for the State ofTelangana,at HyderabadlouTlOne CC to SRl. J. V. PRASAD [(SC ]FORTNCOME rAX) 2. One CC to M/s. A. PRAVHAVATI FOR R.S. ASSOCIATES Advocate, [oPUC] 3. Two CD copies BM\\- BS iII HIGH COURTDATED:0510112023 h1h.Y,?R-.1a.l,Fq*)\1., ORDERWP.No.19190 of 2008 DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS @,x6)o'
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan