Neelu Analjit Singh v. Additional Commiss. Of Income Tax
High Court
30 May 2018 In favour of: Revenue
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Neelu Analjit Singh v. Additional Commiss. Of Income Tax
Date of order
30 May 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Dismissed
The order — as passed by the High Court
Case summary
In Neelu Analjit Singh v. Additional Commiss. Of Income Tax, the High Court (2018) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Decision: Recording the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if necessary and advised.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
$~27
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+ W.P.(C) 6069/2018, CM No.23491/2018
NEELU ANALJIT SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Deepak Chopra, Adv.
versus
ADDITIONAL COMMISS. OF INCOME TAX ..... Respondent Through: Mr.Asheesh Jain, SSC for Revenue
CORAM:HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 30.05.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Tribunal has not taken into consideration the argument that substantial part of the demand/issues raised stood covered in favour of the petitioner vide earlier decision in ITA No. 4737/Del/2017 in the case of Mr. Analjeet Singh, husband of the petitioner.
After some hearing, counsel for the petitioner states that he would move a rectification application before the Tribunal as the petitioner has been directed to furnish security even in respect of demand which is covered in favour of the petitioner vide the aforesaid judgement in the case of Analjeet Singh. It is stated that the quantum of the aforesaid demand is about Rs.100 Crores.
Recording the aforesaid, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn
with liberty to file a fresh writ petition, if necessary and advised. We clarify that we have not made any comments on merits.
Dasti under signature of the Court Master.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
MAY 30, 2018 MR/pk
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.