In Neena v. Assistant Commissioner Of Income-Tax And Another, the High Court (2013) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
Rajan Kumar2013.07.31 10:13I am the author of thisdocumentChandigarhIN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA ATCHANDIGARH
CWP No.8638 of 1989Date of Decision: 29.07.2013
Neena
... Petitioner
Versus
Assistant Commissioner of Income-Tax and another
... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIVE BHALLAHON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON
Present: None.
*****
RAJIVE BHALLA, J.(Oral)
No one has put in appearance on behalf of thepetitioner. As a consequence, we have no option but to dismissthe writ petition for non-prosecution.
(RAJIVE BHALLA)JUDGE
29[th] July, 2013Rajan
(DR. BHARAT BHUSHAN PARSOON)JUDGE
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.