Case Law › High Court › Neha Trading Co v. The Commissioner Of I...

Neha Trading Co v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14

High Court 28 Feb 2013 In favour of: Unclear

Forum / Bench

High Court · newos

Parties

Date of order

28 Feb 2013

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Other

Case summary

In Neha Trading Co v. The Commissioner Of Income Tax-14, the High Court (2013) decided the matter.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

PNP IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.3647 OF 2010INREVIEW PETITION (LODG.) NO.160 OF 2010ININCOME TAX APPEAL (LODG.) NO.1009 OF 2010 Neha Trading Co.versusThe Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ..Petitioner. ..Respondent. ..... Mr. Pankaj R. Toprani for the Review Petitioner.Mr. P.C. Chhotaray with Mr. D.K. Kamwal for the Respondent. ..... CORAM : DR.D.Y.CHANDRACHUD, ANDJ. P. DEVADHAR, JJ. 28 February 2013. P.C. : There is a delay in filing the Review Petition which has been explained in the affidavit in support of the Notice of Motion. The Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (Dr. D.Y.Chandrachud, J.) (J.P. Devadhar, J.)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ File an income-tax appeal (CIT(A)/ITAT) → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.