Neo Trust - Applicant(S v. Commissioner Of Income Tax - Respondent(S

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD INCOME TAX REFERENCE No. 214 of 1995 For Approval and Signature: HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI ==================================================== ========== Whether Reporters of Local Papers 1may be allowed to see the judgment ?judgment ? 2[To be referred to the Reporter or ]not ?not ? 3[Whether their Lordships wish to see ]the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the fair copy of the judgment ?Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to 4the interpretation of the constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?constitution of India, 1950 or any order made thereunder ?5[Whether it is to be circulated to ]the civil judge ?the civil judge ? =================================================== NEO TRUST - Applicant(s) Versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - Respondent(s) ==================================================== Appearance : SERVED BY RPAD - (N)for Applicant(s) : 1,MR MANISH R BHATT for Respondent(s) : 1,================================================= ITR/214/1995 CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA and HONOURABLE MS.JUSTICE H.N.DEVANI Date : 09/01/2006 ORAL JUDGMENT (Per : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.A.MEHTA) 1 Despite service of notice there is no appearance on behalf of the applicant, nor has the applicant filed Paper Book as required by the Rules of this High Court. 2In these circumstances, the Reference is left unanswered for want of prosecution. Reference stands disposed of accordingly. (D.A.Mehta,J) (H.N.Devani, J) m.m.bhatt