Case LawHigh Court › Neogal Power Company (P) Ltd v. Income-T...

Neogal Power Company (P) Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer & Anr

High Court 11 Apr 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
Neogal Power Company (P) Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer & Anr
Date of order
11 Apr 2018
Assessment year(s)
Outcome
Other

Case summary

In Neogal Power Company (P) Ltd v. Income-Tax Officer & Anr, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.

Decision: The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statements made by counsel for the parties.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

$~9 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 6418/2016 NEOGAL POWER COMPANY (P) LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Vohra, Sr. Advocate with Ms. Kavita Jha, Mr.Vaibhav Kulkarni, Advs. versus INCOME-TAX OFFICER & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Mr.Puneet Rai, Advocates CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR O R D E R % 11.04.2018 Learned counsel for the respondent states that he has obtained instructions. The order dated 6[th] June, 2016 would be treated as recalled and withdrawn and after hearing the petitioner, a fresh order would be passed disposing of the objections. Counsel for the petitioner in these circumstance states that the assessment proceedings should not commence for a period of two weeks from the date objections are disposed of. Counsel for the respondent states that this would lead to time constraint unless the Court extends the stay order, for assessment order has to be passed within 60 days from vacation of stay. Counsel for the petitioner states that stay against passing of assessment order may be continued for a period of two weeks from the date the order disposing of the objections is passed. Counsel for the respondent states that this would protect interest of the respondent. The writ petition is disposed of in terms of the statements made by counsel for the parties. The court also directs that the stay against passing of the assessment order would continue for a period of two weeks post the order disposing of the objections. To cut short delay, authorized representative of the petitioner would appear before the respondent No.1 on 16[th] April, 2018 when objections filed by the petitioner to the re-opening would be considered and examined. Dasti under signature of the Court Master. SANJIV KHANNA, J APRIL 11, 2018 pk CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
Facing a similar income-tax issue?
Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.
✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.
Contact Careers Media / Press · Privacy Terms Refund Cancellation Cookies Disclaimer
© 2026 EaseValue Advisors LLP · LLPIN ACN-4920 · Jaipur, Rajasthan