Case Law › High Court › New Delhi Television Limited v. Deputy C...

New Delhi Television Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-18(1), New Delhi And Anr

High Court 10 Aug 2017 In favour of: Revenue

Forum / Bench

High Court · dhcdb

Parties

Date of order

10 Aug 2017

Assessment year(s)

—

Outcome

Dismissed

Case summary

In New Delhi Television Limited v. Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-18(1), New Delhi And Anr, the High Court (2017) dismissed the appeal. The decision went in favour of the Revenue.

Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.

The order — as passed by the High Court

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on: 08.03.2017 Pronounced on: 10.08.2017 + W.P.(C) 9120/2015+ W.P.(C) 11638/2015 NEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through : Sh. S. Ganesh, Sr. Advocate with Sh. Sachit Jolly and Sh. Gautam Swarup, Advocates. versus DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX CIRCLE-18(1), NEW DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through : Sh. P.S. Patwalia, ASG with Sh. N.P. Sahni, Sh. Rahul Chaudhary, Sr. Standing Counsel and Ms. Lakshmi Gurung, Jr. Standing Counsel. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT % The writ petitions are dismissed without any order as to costs. For detailed judgment, the decision dated 10.08.2017 in W.P.(C) 9120/2015 may be referred to. S. RAVINDRA BHAT (JUDGE) AUGUST 10, 2017 NAJMI WAZIRI (JUDGE)

Facing a similar income-tax issue?

Our CA-led litigation team handles notices, scrutiny, penalties and appeals (CIT(A) & ITAT) end-to-end.

✅ Get help with an income-tax notice → 💬 Ask our CA

This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.

Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation. Full disclaimer & Terms.