New Delhi Television Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle 18 (1), New Delhi & Anr
High Court
16 Feb 2018 In favour of: Unclear
Forum / Bench
High Court · dhcdb
Parties
New Delhi Television Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle 18 (1), New Delhi & Anr
Date of order
16 Feb 2018
Assessment year(s)
—
Outcome
Other
Case summary
In New Delhi Television Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Income-Tax Circle 18 (1), New Delhi & Anr, the High Court (2018) decided the matter.
Summary auto-generated from the order below — read the full judgment for the complete reasoning.
The order — as passed by the High Court
$~1
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI+ W.P.(C) 1448/2018
NEW DELHI TELEVISION LIMITED ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sachit Jolly & Mr. Siddharth Joshi, Advocates
versus
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX CIRCLE 18 (1), NEW DELHI & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through: Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel
CORAM:HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R% 23.03.2018 CM No.10086/2018
This is an application for correction for appearance, as recorded
in the order dated 16.2.2018.
By mistake, appearance of Mr. Parag P. Tripathi, Senior Advocate along with Mr. Sachit Jolly, Mr. Rohit Garg and Mr. Aarush Bhatia, Advocates has been marked as counsels appearing for the respondents, instead of the petitioner and Mr. Zoheb Hossain, Senior Standing Counsel along with Mr. Sanjay Tripathi, Add. CIT, Range-18, New Delhi have been marked as appearing for the petitioner, instead of their appearance for the respondents.
The application is disposed of, recording the above corrections.
SANJIV KHANNA, J
MARCH 23, 2018 tp
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J
This page reproduces a public-domain court order (Section 52(1)(q)(iv), Copyright Act 1957). Explanations are EaseValue's original analysis. Always read the original order.
Disclaimer: General information only — not legal, tax or professional advice, and no advocate/CA–client relationship is created. AI-generated summaries may contain errors and must be verified against the original court order. EaseValue accepts no liability for reliance on this content. Not a solicitation.
Full disclaimer & Terms.
EaseValue